On Dec 12, 9:30 pm, Juanlu_001 <juanlu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm, you are right, I might break something if I don't stuck in 2.6...
> All right, thank you very much anyway.
>
> On Dec 12, 3:57 pm, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, December 12, 2010 3:49:33 PM UTC+1, Juanlu_001 wrote:Is
>
> > there any way to accomplish what I'm asking? I do not fear the
> > shell or source code.
>
> > It's possible and done for some linux distributions, but I don't think
> > it's a good idea for you. You can look into Sage's local/lib/python2.6
> > folder, where you can see that you can only save about 40MB (all the
> > rest is in the site packages which are part of sage anyways). Also,
> > Sage is only tested to work well with the given python version. That
> > might not be true for other ones, because some libs directly access
> > python internal datastructures that might be subject to changes and so
> > on. Rather, you could go the other way round and use "sage -python" as
> > your python interpreter or work inside the "Sage Environment" via $
> > sage -sh ... depending on what you want to accomplish.
>
> > H

Is it an idea to do it the other way around? Make symlink to the
python which is contained in sage to use it from outside?
Thats how I did in the sage live CD. So you save space and you can use
all libraries (numpy, sympy ... ) which are already contained in the
sage python.

emil

-- 
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to