On Dec 12, 9:30 pm, Juanlu_001 <juanlu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hmm, you are right, I might break something if I don't stuck in 2.6... > All right, thank you very much anyway. > > On Dec 12, 3:57 pm, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sunday, December 12, 2010 3:49:33 PM UTC+1, Juanlu_001 wrote:Is > > > there any way to accomplish what I'm asking? I do not fear the > > shell or source code. > > > It's possible and done for some linux distributions, but I don't think > > it's a good idea for you. You can look into Sage's local/lib/python2.6 > > folder, where you can see that you can only save about 40MB (all the > > rest is in the site packages which are part of sage anyways). Also, > > Sage is only tested to work well with the given python version. That > > might not be true for other ones, because some libs directly access > > python internal datastructures that might be subject to changes and so > > on. Rather, you could go the other way round and use "sage -python" as > > your python interpreter or work inside the "Sage Environment" via $ > > sage -sh ... depending on what you want to accomplish. > > > H
Is it an idea to do it the other way around? Make symlink to the python which is contained in sage to use it from outside? Thats how I did in the sage live CD. So you save space and you can use all libraries (numpy, sympy ... ) which are already contained in the sage python. emil -- To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support URL: http://www.sagemath.org
