On Jul 29, 2010, at 12:41 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 7/29/10 9:36 AM, Lauri Ruotsalainen wrote: >> Thanks for your feedback! >> >> I looked into licensing (thanks for the info, Jason) and I think GNU >> GPL (2.0 or newer) and CC Attribution-Share-Alike 3.0 (dual)licensing >> fits best for me. A comment stating the license at the beginning of >> the code probably suffices? > > > Yes, I think so. You might also note that the user has the option of > whichever license they choose.
If someone (like me!) incorporates one of these excellent interacts/animations (or any other one for that matter), is it sufficient to add a comparable license to the top or bottom of the corresponding worksheet? Or, should the license accompany the specific item (as a #-comment in the code, for example)? Also, out of curiosity, where are most people putting their licenses? Top or bottom of the worksheet? I've been putting my on the bottom usually, but upon a very brief survey of published worksheets, it looks like most of them are on the top of the worksheet? Lastly, if an individual licenses under CC-SA, can some else then use/modify their work under CC-BY-SA? It seems like the ethical thing to do in this place is to start by crediting the original creator. This licensing stuff can get complicated if everyone does exactly what they are supposed to. It seems like a standard in the Sage community should be advocated to avoid conflict. Dana -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-edu+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en.
