This is amazing. > > The most interesting thing to me is that essentially every single > mistake he makes is due to Sage not supporting implicit > multiplication. He must have to fix or edit his input nearly 10 times > just to fix missing *'s for multiplication. Very interesting.
Ironically, as one of the people who requested it, I just removed it from my .sagerc file because I usually ended up needing to use * anyway. But at that level, and really in calculus too, it is great to have available - especially for things like plotting. > I'm putting "implicit multiplication option in the notebook" on my > todo list for next month. (We have it on the command line but not in > the notebook.) More power to you - would it be a "togglable" feature, something the administrator would need to put in some kind of universal rc file, something user by user...? - kcrisman --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-edu" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-edu@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-edu+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
