On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 07:32:48AM -0700, kcrisman wrote: > > That said, I support the idea of the switch of defaults (if only because > > of spite against Java ;-). > >> > Though I believe we mostly use Jmol in its jsmol form in the notebooks, for > what it's worth :-) Nonetheless having a fully functional threejs is great > news too.
To complement Karl-Dieter's answer, we should notice that in console mode threejs opens a webpage with the javascript. So, if we want to avoid the use of java, we could do exactly the same with opening a webpage as well with jsmol, instead of running (java) jmol. Also, the java issue is now fixed, which also means that jmol is still maintained. Ciao, Thierry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/20190923194150.scfbiqdse4af7fwv%40metelu.net.
