Even considering the pivotal rôle of polynomials and fraction fields 
thereof ?

Le jeudi 20 décembre 2018 20:47:03 UTC+1, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>
> Critical but it's not a blocker, in my opinion.
>
>
> On Thursday, December 20, 2018 at 11:36:15 AM UTC-8, Emmanuel Charpentier 
> wrote:
>>
>> This <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/JuxpFfaKYzA> seems 
>> seems to be a showstopper, enough to trump the best laid out plans of mice, 
>> men and mathematicians.
>>
>> No ticket yet, but I agree that this seems critical. 
>>
>> Le mardi 18 décembre 2018 12:50:44 UTC+1, E. Madison Bray a écrit :
>>>
>>> As pointed out by Samuel last month [1] the transition freeze (i.e. 
>>> new package versions) for the next major Debian release (buster) is 
>>> coming up January 12 [2].  This is important for Sage and those 
>>> working to package Sage for Debian, as it will impact what version of 
>>> Sage is available in Debian, and by extension big name Debian-based 
>>> distributions such as Ubuntu and Mint that carry with them probably 
>>> the majority of users on Linux. 
>>>
>>> Setting what version of Sage will be in Debian, prior to the freeze, 
>>> is not such a big deal in its own right as not many packages depend on 
>>> Sage.  However, it does impact what versions of Sage's many 
>>> dependencies can be included, and GAP perhaps has the largest impact 
>>> there, as there are also many packages that depend on GAP (mostly GAP 
>>> packages). 
>>>
>>> The biggest sticking point right now to packaging Sage for Debian is 
>>> thus what version of GAP can go in Debian as well (and I don't think 
>>> the GAP community will be too happy about it if the GAP version gets 
>>> held back because of Sage; though the more likely outcome there is 
>>> that Sage gets held back (or excluded entirely) if it can't work with 
>>> the new GAP). 
>>>
>>> Thus some of us have been working hard to find a working convergence 
>>> between Sage and GAP 4.10.x.  That work is nearly ready [3] (pending 
>>> some needed patches to GAP), and given the normal rate of Sage's 
>>> release cycle it would be a shame to have this work excluded from Sage 
>>> 8.5, considering that it is the major blocker for Debian. 
>>>
>>> Therefore I propose doing a few more rounds of Sage 8.5 pre-releases 
>>> specifically with the focus of upgrading GAP: Completing #22626 which 
>>> I think will be ready-enough by tomorrow (I would prefer to wait until 
>>> GAP 4.10.1 is out but starting testing now would be better) and 
>>> sending it to the patchbots, while putting a hold on any other 
>>> non-critical fixes. 
>>>
>>> If for some reason that's impossible then we should quickly release a 
>>> Sage 8.6 that is focused primarily on GAP 4.10 compatibility. 
>>>
>>> Thanks, 
>>> Erik 
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sage-devel/ztLmB2xWFig/kWk7LGycCQAJ 
>>> [2] https://release.debian.org/buster/freeze_policy.html 
>>> [3] https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22626 
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to