On 2017-01-16, David Roe <roed...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think anyone's arguing that a changelog is a bad idea. The question > is just whether it's easier to make from fragments in the repository or > from a new field on trac. Personally I think trac,
+1. I know that some people believe it is old fashioned, but I still think that the basic development unit is not a git commit but a merged trac ticket. Thus, it seems to me that trac is the logical place to document development. Best regards, Simon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
