On Wednesday, 9 September 2015 10:25:53 UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 10:09:21 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2015-09-09 17:06, John H Palmieri wrote: >> > I think that we should white-list at least some of these, and also try >> > to convert some of them (all of them?) to new-style packages. Same with >> > Simon's p_group_cohomology package, which didn't build correctly for >> me. >> > I don't have objections to leaving things as they are (i.e., completely >> > opaque, maybe also stop them from being listed in "sage --optional") >> for >> > the broken old-style spkgs (many of the others, although I didn't test >> > all of the ones that were last modified more than 5 years ago). >> >> OK, I am adding this as a variation on (D): >> >> (D''): sage -i OLDSTYLEPKGNAME should give an error, except if >> OLDSTYLEPKGNAME is in a pre-determined white-list of packages. >> >> But the hard question remains: which packages should be white-listed? >> > > From the list I posted, I would suggest > > ore_algebra (pretty small, should be easy to convert, I can work on > that) > chomp > > Also p_group_cohomology, once it's been fixed. > > Does anyone want to advocate for any of these? >
instead of reading and posting here, I just spent time converting jones_numfield to new style. (#19174) If every poster here does spend half a day or a day on this, the issue will be moot... :-) > biopython > cluster_seed > coxeter > lie > phc > nzmath > qhull > > I've never used them and I have no idea if they are still useful. > > -- > John > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
