On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 10:09:21 AM UTC-7, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > > On 2015-09-09 17:06, John H Palmieri wrote: > > I think that we should white-list at least some of these, and also try > > to convert some of them (all of them?) to new-style packages. Same with > > Simon's p_group_cohomology package, which didn't build correctly for me. > > I don't have objections to leaving things as they are (i.e., completely > > opaque, maybe also stop them from being listed in "sage --optional") for > > the broken old-style spkgs (many of the others, although I didn't test > > all of the ones that were last modified more than 5 years ago). > > OK, I am adding this as a variation on (D): > > (D''): sage -i OLDSTYLEPKGNAME should give an error, except if > OLDSTYLEPKGNAME is in a pre-determined white-list of packages. > > But the hard question remains: which packages should be white-listed? >
>From the list I posted, I would suggest ore_algebra (pretty small, should be easy to convert, I can work on that) chomp Also p_group_cohomology, once it's been fixed. Does anyone want to advocate for any of these? biopython cluster_seed coxeter lie phc nzmath qhull I've never used them and I have no idea if they are still useful. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
