On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 07:58:53PM +0200, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> About dependencies (again):
> Working with Vincent on Combinatorial Designs (many tickets between
> beta releases) taught us that it is better to 'artificially' order all
> tickets linearly. Each ticket should have a successor and a
> predecessor, and they should all be linearly ordered. It is tempting to
> let some branches be independent, but if for some reason you find out
> later that they still interact somehow it will create a *LOT* of mess
> if you already have tickets based on those two branches.
On en revient finalement à la bonne vieille pile de patchs :-)
Bon, ok, avec quand même de la bien meilleure technologie pour rebaser!
Bonne nuit!
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
