On Thursday, January 2, 2014 6:08:59 PM UTC-10, Nils Bruin wrote: > > In which case we'd want a lot more history discarding/rewriting to happen > before a commit gets positive review. Wouldn't we be back at the hg > workflow with patches, with patches replaced by git commits? >
No, the key is to send commit ranges for review. In other words, you squash the history for review *only*, but then go back and use the git merge for the original history. One example of a review tool is Phabricator (from Facebook), there are others. Downside is that it is yet another complicated machine, with its own command line utilities. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
