Yooooooooo !! > Yes indeed -- with a formula like that, there's little reason not to > implement it ad-hoc every time. Unless a user wants it, and doesn't > know this bit of information. Though... what Nathannnnnn said was > that he wants to know which bit changes... > > (i.valuation(2) for i in srange(1,2^n)) > > does the job -- though this can certainly be implemented better.
Well, it's true that the one-liner simplifies a lot of things :-D There are good implementations there if we need them in some fast C code though : www.jjj.de/fxt/fxtbook.pdf But my problem is solved ! Thanks :-D Nathann -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
