On 2013-08-23 08:53, William Stein wrote:
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
On 2013-08-22 18:32, William Stein wrote:
(1) uses a random url
token when popping up the browser (to avoid needing the password).
(2) by default only opens a server on localhost,
This could easily be implemented for the Sage cell server, right? What I
meant to say was: there is no fundamental reason why it cannot be at least
as secure as the Sage notebook.
I don't know how to answer this question. I think it's just a matter
of definitions.
One question that needs to be answered is also: what's our audience, why
would we add sagecell as a standard package? Are we talking about users
running sagecell for themselves (as a replacement for ./sage -n) or are
we talking about sysadmins running university-wide cell servers?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
