On 2013-06-16, kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> wrote: > ------=_Part_606_21518160.1371342662093 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > > On Saturday, June 15, 2013 5:26:31 PM UTC-4, William wrote: >> >> >> On Jun 15, 2013 12:22 PM, "Andrey Novoseltsev" >> <novo...@gmail.com<javascript:>> >> wrote: >> > >> > On Jun 14, 4:28 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > Some additional remarks: >> > > >> > > - I plan to (eventually) make Ipython also available as an integral >> > > part ofhttp://cloud.sagemath.com;if you open a .sagews you get the >> > > worksheet I've developed, but if you open an ipython notebook file, >> > > you'll get an ipython embedded there. This is much like what wakari >> > > does. >> > > >> > > - I also plan to make a single-user version of cloud.sagemath, which >> > > cuts out all the complicated database and multi-user functionality, >> > > leaving just the javascript client and single project server. >> > > >> > > -- William >> > >> > So what will be medium/long term solution for those who need multiple >> > users functionality for courses with many students but cannot yet >> > convince administration to get a paid subscription for cloud.sagemath >> > or in general prefer to run local campus servers for faster access and >> > shutdown/upgrade control?.. >> > >> >> Students would pay directly, but it would be much cheaper than webassign. >> >> > ?? But isn't WebAssign more like WeBWorK in its goals, except (presumably) > with adaptive questions and guided solutions (which WW does not currently > have)? I'm not really clear as to what the relation between the "Sage" > type goals and "WW" type goals is with cloud.sagemath. > > It would be unfortunate if the Sage notebook were to fall to the energy > behind SagemathCloud without having some alternate project (like the > IPython notebook, perhaps) providing this functionality; Andrey's points > are legitimate. It clearly fills a need, especially as long as Sage > doesn't have a one-download solution for Windows. (Which reminds me to ask > if anyone still knows how to take the now-working Cygwin and box it up, as > was apparently done long ago...)
it makes more sense to make a cygwin package containing Sage. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
