On Sunday, December 2, 2012 9:43:49 AM UTC-8, Charles Bouillaguet wrote: > > > And now, for something completely different. > > I think that the reference manual is very useful, but its linear > structure (a loooooong list of items where it is not obvious where to > find what you are looking for) is a bit baffling for beginners. I come > from the MAGMA community, and I tend to think that the hierarchical > structure of the MAGMA reference manual is a bit easier to navigate > (http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/handbook/). I could try to > propose a patch implementing such a structure if someone thinks its > worth it... >
See http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/palmieri/misc/6495-jsmath/html/en/reference/index.html for what the reference manual might look like if http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495 is every merged into Sage. Do you like that any better? -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
