I usually consider MIT / BSD / Apache 2.0 to be a fairly optimal license for the work I do. (In that they function to apply credit, limit liability, and pretty much nothing else. I like licenses that optimize the freedom of people to use the code for what they want.)
--Christopher On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:25 PM, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Christopher Swenson <ch...@caswenson.com> > wrote: > > Also see this wonderful flow chat written by some of my > > coworkers: http://cl.ly/5nAo > > I like it! > > They forgot the WTFPL: http://sam.zoy.org/wtfpl/ (gpl compatible!) > > Also, i think just "public domain" is not possible for them. This is a > type of "license" that is available in the US, but not in most other > countries. E.g. the author is always associated with the work, no > matter what. You can only remove some rights. But that's very > complicated and don't ask me for details ... I just want to mention > that even this pd is not an optimal choice. (At the "creative commons" > pages are some explanations around this) > > H > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
