On 19 March 2012 02:06, Dan Drake <dr...@kaist.edu> wrote: > On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 at 06:44PM -0700, Keshav Kini wrote: >> Dan Drake <dr...@kaist.edu> writes: >> > I'm afraid that, by pushing GSoC students to a different list, we would >> > be in effect creating two classes of developers. It would be a bit like >> > having the "grownups table" and "kids table" at holiday meals. >> >> I don't think the point is to move GSoC students to a different list. >> It's to move *requests to become* GSoC students to a different list. If >> someone is doing Sage development they are always welcome at sage-devel. >> But people might want to ask about our GSoC program before even >> installing or trying Sage for the first time, in which case they don't >> even belong in sage-support yet :)
That's what I had in mind when I suggested this. Obviously anyone actually doing Sage development is welcome to sage-devel, but I was getting the impression that there were a lot of applications to do stuff, some (many?) of which would be turned down, and that this application process should be handled separately by those who have volunteered to be mentors, rather than discussed publicly. John > > Ah, true. Let's be sure we shepherd our final GSoC students back to > sage-devel for development! > > Dan > > -- > --- Dan Drake > ----- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake > ------- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
