Hi Jason, On 28 Nov., 16:27, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > That is my understanding with any GPL license---if you don't specify > version numbers, the user gets to pick whatever version number they want.
That would make life a bit easier. The main question for me remains: Should I try to port my changes and additions (by the way, I found that the actual changes to the MeatAxe source are only 180 kB, not 600 kB as I originally thought) to MeatAxe 2.4.13? Pro: It is generally better to stay synchronized with upstream. Con 1: There doesn't seem to be much active development on MeatAxe, and what I do could be considered a fork. So, perhaps I *am* upstream? Con 2: For me, porting my changes would be a substantial effort, since most function names have changed between 2.2.4 and 2.4.13. Con 3: For the project I get my money from, staying with the old version would be fine. So, why waste resources? Any more Pros? Cheers, Simon -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
