One more thing: On Jul 22, 2011, at 12:06 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:38 , William Stein wrote: [snip] > >> Thanks. This is the single most important question now, since it >> determines whether it is currently possible to use Sage on 10.7 or >> not. > > The good news is that almost all tests pass. That's also the bad news :-} > > The failed tests are > devel/sage/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst # 2 doctests failed > devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctests failed > devel/sage/sage/misc/preparser.py # 2 doctests failed > devel/sage/sage/numerical/optimize.py # 6 doctests failed > > I have not yet looked at the details, but they mostly appear to be problems > finding entry points in library code. I put the full (ptestlong) log at > sage.math.washington.edu:~justin/logs/10.7-test.log > > Comments welcome... It's worth mentioning that this is a stock sage-4.7 build, built under 10.6(.7 or 8). Justin -- Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income -------- Experience is what you get when you don't get what you want. -------- -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
