On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:38 , William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:29 AM, Justin C. Walker <jus...@mac.com> wrote:
>> Hi, WIlliam,
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2011, at 11:13 , William Stein wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Justin,
>>>
>>> Does a sage-4.7 binary built on OS X 10.6 work on OS X 10.7?
>>
>> Yup. I think 10.6 binaries that don't use "exotic" libraries (e.g., non-GUI
>> programs) should run. I haven't tested that theory extensively, though.
>>
>> I am running a "ptestlong" now; no guarantees, though. I'll let y'all know
>> when something shows up...
>
> Thanks. This is the single most important question now, since it
> determines whether it is currently possible to use Sage on 10.7 or
> not.
The good news is that almost all tests pass. That's also the bad news :-}
The failed tests are
devel/sage/doc/en/numerical_sage/cvxopt.rst # 2 doctests failed
devel/sage/sage/matrix/matrix_double_dense.pyx # 1 doctests failed
devel/sage/sage/misc/preparser.py # 2 doctests failed
devel/sage/sage/numerical/optimize.py # 6 doctests failed
I have not yet looked at the details, but they mostly appear to be problems
finding entry points in library code. I put the full (ptestlong) log at
sage.math.washington.edu:~justin/logs/10.7-test.log
Comments welcome...
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon at Large
Institute for the Absorption of Federal Funds
-----------
My wife 'n kids 'n dogs are gone,
I can't get Jesus on the phone,
But Ol' Milwaukee's Best is my best friend.
-----------
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
