> He's probably talking about my ATLAS-3.8.3 spkg, not the development > version. That one works perfectly and should be merged ASAP. Various people > are using it successfully to work around build problems with the old ATLAS > build system but nobody dared to give it a positive review. > > I have also noted breakage with the new ATLAS-3.9.xx, though I'm still on > the fence whether its an ATLAS or a LinBox bug. > I see, I will look at that ticket then. I am not sure about linbox either I should try to compile it against ATLAS 3.9.40 and see what happens. But the failure I asked him about actually arise in iml compiled against 3.9.23 and possibly later. I have abandonned building the sage stack against ATLAS on sage-on-gentoo. It is still doable but I am now favoring openblas for my own installs with some caveats: https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/issues/13 I am seriously considering making an experimental spkg for this, compilation time is much shorter and the performance is reasonable.
Francois This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments. Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more information. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
