> On 05/15/11 08:47 AM, Julien PUYDT wrote: > > Le 12/05/2011 17:13, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > >> At this point nothing is blocking the sage-4.7 release any more. So it > >> would be nice if everybody could try to build and test Sage, to see > >> whether there are any remaining issues. If not, I will release sage-4.7 > >> in about a week or so. > > > > sage-4.7rc2 still has a singular which doesn't compile with ARM > > processors ; see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10810 > > > > Snark on #sagemath > > We should look at updating Singular, but that's not going to happen when > "rc2" is released. Updating .spkg's tends to happen in the alpha releases. > > Your patch may be ok, but is clearly going to make changes on numerous > systems, not just ARM, so I dont feel able to give it a positive review.
Speaking of updating singular there is a 3.1.3.1 release now but I haven't tried to build libsingular for that release and then build sage on top of it - that's the part that failed miserably in 3.1.2. On the other hand singular seems to be getting a python interface it may be an idea to investigate switching to that. This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments. Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more information. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
