> On 9 Jun., 22:20, François Bissey <f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz> wrote: > > > On 9 Jun., 13:43, François Bissey <f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz> wrote: > > I haven't tested your new spkg but I ran > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/lib/singular/ > > as you did in your ticket after removing everything that happens > > after installing libsingular. My notes in my ebuild are saying: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------- The following is needed to get libfac.a libcf.a? > > libcfmem.a? > > libsingcf_g.a? libsingfac.a? (the last 2 have some defects) > > We should check that all these are really needed. > > Then if needed check if we could build a specific target rather than > > reconfiguring. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ------------------ after removing those: > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/ > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function_factory.py" > > [15.9 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pyx" > > [19.2 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/option.pyx" > > [17.1 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/polynomial.pyx" > > [16.5 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/groebner_strategy.pyx" > > [17.5 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular.pxi" > > [0.3 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/__init__.py" > > [0.3 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/ring.pyx" > > [21.9 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/function.pyx" > > [24.7 s] > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/libs/singular/singular-cdefs.pxi" > > [19.8 s] > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > All tests passed! > > Total time for all tests: 153.3 seconds > > > > I also tested > > sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/singular.py > > sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/interfaces/singular.py" > > [27.8 s] > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > All tests passed! > > Total time for all tests: 27.8 seconds > > (I did test interfaces/singular, too, but didn't report on the > ticket.) > > What machine did you test on? (sysload?) > My old slow Pentium4 (single core with "hyper threading", i.e. > slightly faster context switches) is about 3-4 times faster... ;-) > > > So I think it could removed. It may have used at some point in time > > but not any more. > > Something more to be investigated at the Sage/Singular meeting. :-) > I realised that I have to do one more thing to make sure the test results are valid. I will report on that later. My system: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ (1.5GB ram) I was building paraview-3.8.0 at the same time.
Francois -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
