On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> wrote: > On 06/ 7/10 10:22 AM, François Bissey wrote: >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> >>> I am personally all for updating to the beta version of ATLAS. >>> >> We are currently using 3.9.23 in sage-on-gentoo without any >> issues. The only reason we don't use 3.9.24 is that the person >> who usually does the revbump is "away" atm. >> >> Francois >> > > Do you have a package for this which you can share? Has the person who bumps > it up cleaned it up at all? > > The installation system of ATLAS on Sage looks a bit messy, with a > combination of perl, python, sh and bash scripts. I'd like to clean it up, > but I'm sure I'd break something on some platform. Many are Itanium > specific, but I don't have access to any Itanium hardware myself. > > Is SAGE_FAT_BINARY actually used by anyone?
YES. It is *extremely* important. William > > Dave > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- William Stein Professor of Mathematics University of Washington http://wstein.org -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
