On 06/ 7/10 11:23 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On 06/ 7/10 10:22 AM, François Bissey wrote:
Thoughts?
I am personally all for updating to the beta version of ATLAS.
We are currently using 3.9.23 in sage-on-gentoo without any
issues. The only reason we don't use 3.9.24 is that the person
who usually does the revbump is "away" atm.
Francois
Do you have a package for this which you can share? Has the person who
bumps it up cleaned it up at all?
In sage-on-gentoo we exclusively use system packages. Everything now
is under the control of portage - the equivalent of rpm/deb. So I am
talking about ATLAS provided by the distro here.
The installation system of ATLAS on Sage looks a bit messy, with a
combination of perl, python, sh and bash scripts. I'd like to clean it up,
but I'm sure I'd break something on some platform. Many are Itanium
specific, but I don't have access to any Itanium hardware myself.
I could send you the ebuild which is really a building recipe of the same
kind as spkg-install.
That might be useful. If its suitable for email posting, it would be worth
putting in the list. I think most of the code in spkg-install will probably not
be relevant to you, but I think spkg-install for atlas does need to be cleaned up.
Is SAGE_FAT_BINARY actually used by anyone?
No idea.
Francois
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
