> On 06/ 7/10 10:22 AM, François Bissey wrote: > >>> Thoughts? > >> > >> I am personally all for updating to the beta version of ATLAS. > > > > We are currently using 3.9.23 in sage-on-gentoo without any > > issues. The only reason we don't use 3.9.24 is that the person > > who usually does the revbump is "away" atm. > > > > Francois > > Do you have a package for this which you can share? Has the person who > bumps it up cleaned it up at all? >
In sage-on-gentoo we exclusively use system packages. Everything now is under the control of portage - the equivalent of rpm/deb. So I am talking about ATLAS provided by the distro here. > The installation system of ATLAS on Sage looks a bit messy, with a > combination of perl, python, sh and bash scripts. I'd like to clean it up, > but I'm sure I'd break something on some platform. Many are Itanium > specific, but I don't have access to any Itanium hardware myself. > I could send you the ebuild which is really a building recipe of the same kind as spkg-install. > Is SAGE_FAT_BINARY actually used by anyone? > No idea. Francois -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
