+1 John
2010/1/13 David Roe <r...@math.harvard.edu>: > +1. > > I'm trying to coercions between finite fields to behave automatically, which > leads to needing nth roots in finite fields for large n (exactly the > situation Yann is talking about). Not having to worry about factoring p^k-1 > would be really nice: I'm already having to worry about various speed issues > in object creation if this change works out. > David > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:16 PM, YannLC <yannlaiglecha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > That said, it is probably reasonable to make your package standard. >> > >> > Yes, surely. That's why I suggested bringing the discussion here for >> > a vote. YannLC needs to make his case! >> >> Here comes my arguments: >> * it's useful for people working with small characteristic finite >> fields. >> (maybe other use cases...) >> * it's something Magma have and Sage don't yet >> * it's small: less than 0.5Mb >> * it's harmless: no compilation, data is just a list of integers >> >> my vote: >> +1 to make it standard as soon as possible (I might not be very >> neutral though) >> >> >> -- >> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com >> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to >> sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel >> URL: http://www.sagemath.org > > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > >
-- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
