> > That said, it is probably reasonable to make your package standard. > > Yes, surely. That's why I suggested bringing the discussion here for > a vote. YannLC needs to make his case!
Here comes my arguments: * it's useful for people working with small characteristic finite fields. (maybe other use cases...) * it's something Magma have and Sage don't yet * it's small: less than 0.5Mb * it's harmless: no compilation, data is just a list of integers my vote: +1 to make it standard as soon as possible (I might not be very neutral though) -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
