On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Ondrej Certik<ond...@certik.cz> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Turk<matthewt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Ondrej, >> >> Thanks for your speedy reply. Looking a bit closer, it seems to me >> that a lot of this may be related to coercion of types to be sage >> types. By replacing the SageObject stuff with "object" or simply >> removing it (as is done elsewhere in the codebase) I was able to get >> to the point of the srange object attempting to use ring objects and >> so on, which I think might indicate a deeper dependency. >> >> If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. I've been >> exploring the notebook code base in FEMhub but I'm still a quite >> unfamiliar with it, and it's not even clear to me if the time would be >> best spent there or in the SAGE 4.x series. The interact >> functionality is pretty awesome, so I'm also hopeful that it can be >> used externally. > > I would wait for William with this, as I think it's better if all of > us work on one notebook together, I think he plans to start on this in > about 3 weeks.
> > I hope the notebook will be fully usable without Sage. William, is > this the plan? Absolutely, definitely, yes. And it is the very first step of the plan. I'm putting this ahead of even doing automated load testing, since if I do this, then it will be much easier to get help from you (and you, and you, and everybody else reading this) on all the other steps :-). William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
