On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Matthew Turk<matthewt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ondrej,
>
> Thanks for your speedy reply.  Looking a bit closer, it seems to me
> that a lot of this may be related to coercion of types to be sage
> types.  By replacing the SageObject stuff with "object" or simply
> removing it (as is done elsewhere in the codebase) I was able to get
> to the point of the srange object attempting to use ring objects and
> so on, which I think might indicate a deeper dependency.
>
> If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know.  I've been
> exploring the notebook code base in FEMhub but I'm still a quite
> unfamiliar with it, and it's not even clear to me if the time would be
> best spent there or in the SAGE 4.x series.  The interact
> functionality is pretty awesome, so I'm also hopeful that it can be
> used externally.

I would wait for William with this, as I think it's better if all of
us work on one notebook together, I think he plans to start on this in
about 3 weeks.

I hope the notebook will be fully usable without Sage. William, is
this the plan?

Ondrej

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to