Hi!
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 02:12:26AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> As many of us have stated on IRC and elsewhere, lots of us reviewing
> the categories stuff got burned out after Sage days and then busy
> with lots of other stuff. There's lots of good code here that should
> go in, and it's a blocker for much of the sage-combinat stuff as well.
>
> I've just reviewed http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6110
> (pickle decorator) and put a patch up at http://trac.sagemath.org/
> sage_trac/ticket/6121 (pickle metaclass) that needs review. A lot of
> us have reservations about shipping a modified cPickle, so I propose
> we proceed by using the metaclass in Category (and elsewhere as
> needed) so we can get onto the really interesting stuff.
By the way: do you have an alternative plan for #5985 (cPickle
modification for dynamic classes)? If not, would you or Craig mind
finish reviewing it? Then it and #5991 could go in, possibly even
maybe for 4.0.2?
By the way, what's the status for #5598 (coerce declare)?
Thanks in advance,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs: http://www.sagemath.org
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
