> What's the status on this one? I though that the bottom line of the > discussion at SD15 for this one (not to be mixed up with #5986) was that: > > - Apart from importing the cPickle sources into the Sage tree, the > patch was essentially trivial (a 5 lines change to the cPickle > code) and therefore easy to review > - It had some reasonable chances to be merged into Python at some point. > - Craig was going to push this upstream > - There were no simple alternatives > > And that in view of all this it was good to go in Sage, and would get > a positive review shortly. Which did not occur. > > Craig, Carl: could you please do this now or comment back why not? >
My plan is still to push this upstream at some point soon, with the intention that it make it into Python 2.7/3.2. However, the release date for 2.7 isn't even set yet -- meaning it's still quite a ways off. Honestly, I don't recall -- what was our plan for patching this in the interim? Or did we not decide on anything because we got sidetracked talking about #5986? -cc --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
