On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Craig Citro <craigci...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Maybe I'm just hung up on the word "assign", since it does most of >>> what I would want, it just seems pushy. >> >> I put the relevant usernames in the cc: box, presuming that they might >> take the hint. Do they? I haven't collected data :) >> > > Indeed, I think what Nick's describing is a really good system. I've > often been cc'd on tickets, and I've definitely reviewed many of those > (which I presumably wouldn't have otherwise seen).
Well, for the record, on about 4 occasions I have systematically went through and read all tickets that "needs review", for each one come up with 1-2 people who could review them, then wrote those people a personal email asking them to do the review if possible. In practice this does work very very well. This exactly mirrors the review system used by journals. I will continue doing this until I can convince somebody else to help out. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
