I wonder if there could be an online mechanism for suggesting reviewers. Sometimes I look at a patch, and I think (for example) "I'm not sure I can review this well, but I bet X or Y could...". I don't want to "assign" them the ticket, since that seems overbearing. I know I would want to be informed of any geometry module patches, since I am interested and feel that I could review most of them. Of course sometimes I browse the "with patch, needs review" by category, but an email note might help.
Maybe I'm just hung up on the word "assign", since it does most of what I would want, it just seems pushy. -Marshall On May 27, 6:13 pm, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 5/27/09, Jason Grout <jason-s...@creativetrax.com> wrote: > > > > > I just noticed that there are *109* "needs review" tickets. Looking > > through the list athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/report/10, I see > > some extremely cool pieces of code in trac. > > > Just a reminder... > > Hey Jason, > > Could you go through all 103 tickets and send some personalized review > requests to relevant/interested people? This would take about 2-3 > hours. See my blog post on the need for an editor to send out regular > review requests. > > William > > > > > Thanks, > > > Jason > > > P.S. There are 17 positive reviews waiting to be merged and 103 "needs > > work" tickets too. > > > -- > > Jason Grout > > -- > William Stein > Associate Professor of Mathematics > University of Washingtonhttp://wstein.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
