>Could you please elaborate (in technical terms) what is wrong in >principle with our Risch algorithm implementation, apart that it needs >fixing for integrals that it cannot yet do? Or is the approach we took >with sympy not the right one to get the symbolic integration done. > >If Sage developers are willing to write calculus things in Python (or >Cython) I am definitely interested, if it'd be possible to use it as a >standalone package (e.g. without the rest of Sage, currently 1GB after >unpacking on my system). > >To put my question in other words, what exactly should be done to >implement the symbolic integration in Sage? I want to have symbolic >integration in Python and so far what I (and mainly Mateusz, Kirill >and other sympy developers) tried is in sympy. So if our approach is >wrong, I am interested in critical opinions.
Ondrej, As an objective measure of sympy, what results do you get for the Schaums test suite: http://axiom-developer.org/axiom-website/CATS Tim Daly --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
