On Wednesday 21 August 2024 at 13:16:48 UTC-7 Matthias Koeppe wrote: On Wednesday, August 21, 2024 at 7:33:26 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I don't consider this approved, as my complaint about the previous discussions and related proposals and credits due is not addressed I'll note that extraordinary claims such as those that Dima Pasechnik made above in https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/vFsNl87zLxo/m/YjRMdBUQAQAJ and https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/vFsNl87zLxo/m/JxIf6CAQAQAJ, as well as https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/38475, need at least a hint of substantiation. Such substantiation has not been provided. On the google groups comment linked to by the second reference you give, Dima does link to a very explicit proposal that does share substantial features with the proposed policy change discussed here. So substantiation is definitely provided. In Nathan's response you can actually read his take on the difference between the proposals (just the version pinning, as far as I can tell). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/4fc9cd2c-2918-4681-83be-fb8ea5cc669fn%40googlegroups.com.
