Any suggestions on how to move forward now? Should I simply open a new vote or are there still open questions or a need to discuss certain aspects of the proposal?
On Sunday, 4 June 2023 at 19:49:23 UTC+2 G. M.-S. wrote: > > For the benefit of all of us (including Dima, Matthias and Tobias), would > it be possible to start afresh, without any reference whatsoever to these 3 > linked discussions? > > Also, would it be possible for David to act somehow as a "moderator"? > > Best, > > Guillermo > > On Sun, 4 Jun 2023 at 17:37, Tobias Diez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Saturday, 3 June 2023 at 19:31:18 UTC+8 Marc Culler wrote: >> >> That is what always happens when people try to force a vote before there >> has been a discussion of sufficient depth to allow a consensus to form. >> >> >> To clarify since this point came up before: The discussion about this >> topic started over two years ago in >> https://github.com/sagemath/sage/issues/30384, then this February >> continued on the sage mailing list ( >> https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/j1cwbTU8aOU/m/2sTiwdKPBQAJ) and >> in April in the PR https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/35403. However, >> only Matthias, Dima and me joined the discussion. Since we three couldn't >> come to a consensus, I opened the vote in order to get the input from the >> broader sage community (following advice from David and William). >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/feaeb36f-129b-4c18-9789-6cc97c1556a9n%40googlegroups.com.
