I don't understand what is going on with this patch. I'm wondering if it would be worthwhile creating a new patch based on a different version of SAGE? If so, should I use sage-2.10.alpha* or ...?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On Jan 16, 2008 5:17 PM, SAGE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > #1485: [with bundle, with negative review] wrapper for invariant_ring and > invariant_algebra_reynolds in Singular > ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ > Reporter: wdj | Owner: malb > Type: enhancement | Status: reopened > Priority: major | Milestone: sage-2.10 > Component: commutative algebra | Resolution: > Keywords: | > ---------------------------------+------------------------------------------ > Changes (by mabshoff): > > * summary: [with bundle, with positive review] wrapper for > invariant_ring and invariant_algebra_reynolds > in Singular => [with bundle, with negative > review] wrapper for invariant_ring and > invariant_algebra_reynolds in Singular > > Comment: > > While somebody is at it: please attach single commit change sets as patch > in the future. > > Cheers, > > Michael > > -- > Ticket URL: > <http://modular.math.washington.edu:9002/sage_trac/ticket/1485#comment:8> > SAGE <http://sagemath.org/> > Sage - Open Source Mathematical Software: Building the Car Instead of > Reinventing the Wheel > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
