On Jan 6, 2008 9:52 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 6, 2008, at 21:06 , William Stein wrote: > > > > > On Jan 6, 2008 4:17 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Jan 6, 2008, at 15:19 , Joshua Kantor wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> I wanted to check that moving via finder work. So thats good. > >>> > >>> The tex issue may be because I created the binary dist from another > >>> binary dist. > > > > The binary distribution doesn't contain the devel/doc-main directory > > at present, hence the doctests on those files will fail since they > > aren't > > there. The doctest failure above from your email hints at this: > > > > "Testing SAGE tutorial > > /tmp/sage/local/bin/sage-maketest: line 18: cd: /tmp/sage/devel/doc/ > > tut: No such file or directory > > ERROR: File ./tut.tex is missing > > exit code: 1" > > I saw that, but wasn't sure whether those directories were > deliberately, or accidentally, missing :-} > > > Options: > > (1) Add the pure tex files into bdist, or > > (2) Add all of doc-main to bdist (we include sage-main) > > (3) Remove testing the tex files from "make check" for bdist. > > > > What do you guys think? I like (2). > > It costs a mere 80MB or so, right? How critical is that size > difference? > > I'd think it a good idea to include at least the primary doc set, or > maybe just the html set...
The html documentation is included. It is in SAGE_ROOT/doc/ However, I think the tex files are not in there. -- Wiliam --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
