On Jan 6, 2008, at 21:06 , William Stein wrote:
> > On Jan 6, 2008 4:17 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> On Jan 6, 2008, at 15:19 , Joshua Kantor wrote: >> >>> >>> I wanted to check that moving via finder work. So thats good. >>> >>> The tex issue may be because I created the binary dist from another >>> binary dist. > > The binary distribution doesn't contain the devel/doc-main directory > at present, hence the doctests on those files will fail since they > aren't > there. The doctest failure above from your email hints at this: > > "Testing SAGE tutorial > /tmp/sage/local/bin/sage-maketest: line 18: cd: /tmp/sage/devel/doc/ > tut: No such file or directory > ERROR: File ./tut.tex is missing > exit code: 1" I saw that, but wasn't sure whether those directories were deliberately, or accidentally, missing :-} > Options: > (1) Add the pure tex files into bdist, or > (2) Add all of doc-main to bdist (we include sage-main) > (3) Remove testing the tex files from "make check" for bdist. > > What do you guys think? I like (2). It costs a mere 80MB or so, right? How critical is that size difference? I'd think it a good idea to include at least the primary doc set, or maybe just the html set... Justin -- They said it couldn't be done, but sometimes, it doesn't work out that way. - Casey Stengel -- --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
