On 8/20/07, alex clemesha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > *unless* we actually start providing some math functionality. > > Isn't SAGE "math functionality"? :)
It is definitely not the case that SAGE is only "math functionality". The Notebook GUI, the interfaces to other programs, and DSage all apriori have nothing to do with mathematics. > Those who where at SAGE days 4 might remember that Dorian > and I have already spent a bunch of effort working on a general > notebook interface to Python and theoretically any other interpreted > languages installed on the machine. > > We GPL'd it during sage days 4 and we are continuing to work on it, > including a non-reliance on Pexpect (which does not work on Windows), Pexpect not working on windows is subject to debate. > see: > > trac.knoboo.com > > Obviously we want it to work perfectly with SAGE because SAGE has > some much amazing functionality. Maybe combined effort would be good :) Yep, certainly. SAGElite should be more than just the notebook, though. It's also the interfaces to other programs, and DSAGE, and a minimum. William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
