> Thoughts? Basically, the initial point of this is that if somebody > wants to use > SAGE just to talk with mathematica, or just for the notebook then they > can trivially do so. If they need serious math functionality, they > have to install > something more. In the long run though, with help from Sympy, this could > have a feel very much like SAGE, but without all the serious mathematical > functionality -- but still enough for some users.
I envision a maintenance nightmare. Does function 'xy' depend on anything outside of Python? Can you even unbundle the stuff that far without big hassles (e.g., the SINGULAR interfaces converts to SAGE MPolynomials)? I really like the comes-with-batteries-included approach of SAGE. Martin -- name: Martin Albrecht _pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99 _www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb _jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
