didier deshommes wrote: > 2007/8/20, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The overall situation: Most major packets build, I believe sympow and > > cvxopt are the remaining holdouts. cvxopt complains about a missing > > complex.h. I know that there cvxopt binaries for Solaris - so any > > ideas? sympow might be slightly harder to crack due to the whole Sparc > > thing. >
> Hi, > I had no problem building sympow after making sure that CC='gcc'. Of > course, it gives me: "You do not appear to have an x86 based system > --- not using fpu.c Okay. > " and I don't know whether that's important or not (is that what the > Sparc thing is about?). Yeah, I think that sympow uses extended precision for doubles. I never ran properly on Cygwin on x86 cpus, so I am somewhat worried on getting this to run properly on Sparc without some freaky gcc flags or some sparc assembly. I don't think it is high on Willam's priority list because it seems to be rather specialized, > I should have more time to look at it in 4 hours. Cool, I won't be around then any more (bedtime for me in an hour or two), but let us know what you find out. > > didier Cheers, Michael --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
