> Sorry, I don't understand why the position of Wykobi developer can be > considered "correct". I take the code of what he calls the "non > commercial version". He calls that in this way, but the code is the > code and its license, the GPL, tells me that I CAN use it in a > commercial way. What the developer says is ininfluent, the license > permits me the commercial use, full stop. Nobody can oblige me to read > what he says in his website, I read the code and the license attached > to the code which is the GPL. Am I wrong?
Nobody can oblige you to read any licensing agreement... but you're still responsible if you infringe on his copyright. However, this guy's license is worthless. He offers it under GPL to people who don't use it commercially. These people are only held to the GPL, so they're free to redistribute under the GPL. This includes commercial interests. > > Regards > > Tiziano from Italy > > On Aug 14, 6:35 pm, Alex Ghitza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi, >> >> About 30 seconds of google-ing "gpl commercial" yielded the following >> email written by Richard Stallman (see below). Of course, it is >> *theoretically* possible that he is also "confused about the GPL", but I >> think that's unlikely. Of course, I agree with the replies about the >> impropriety of the post's tone and wording, even if the statements made >> had been completely correct. >> >> Alex >> > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
