On Jun 22, 2007, at 5:35 AM, William Stein wrote: > On 6/22/07, Gonzalo Tornaria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm just working on "fixing the old model", i.e. correctly implement >> some base extension stuff with recursion that fixes at least 90% of >> the examples which were broken. >> >> Additionally, I'm not touching any of the has_coerce_map_from() and >> _coerce_() stuff at all, my new code uses these to decide on things, >> so improvements on those will be useful. > > Robert B -- are you working on this, i.e., _coerce_ and > has_coerce_map_from, etc.? My impression is that it would be *very* > good if somebody did. I would love to work on it, but I don't have > time now, since I spent all my time on the notebook, and I'll be > teaching the next two weeks. You had numerous very good ideas > about improving _coerce_impl last time we talked...
Yes, I am currently working on this. - Robert --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
