> Does anyone else think that 173.binary() should be legal? Currently > the > preparser mangles it into a syntax error, it thinks the dot is a > decimal point. One currently needs to do (173).binary() instead.
IMO it should be legal. And moreover tab completion should be made to work. Will be tricky! ciao --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
