On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Iftikhar Burhanuddin wrote:
> On the same lines, I would be happy is tab completion worked in the > following scenario. > > sage: SupersingularModule(11). > > Should this be legal? And should be implemented without actually > creating > the oject with *just* syntatic checking? What say folks? How on earth would one implement that? There's no guarantee that the object being returned would be a SupersingularModule, and if it there was such a guarantee, you wouldn't know what methods were attached to the object. I presume actually computing the SupersingularModule is expensive? David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ and http://modular.math.washington.edu/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
