Hello Madou!

Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 <20220112222439.yupcs%[email protected]>:
 |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 | <20220112001217.mq8xe%[email protected]>:
 ||Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
 || <20220111145923.vuz7r%[email protected]>:
 || ...
 |||| |I send you this message because I'm unable to send emails from
 |||| |Microsoft Exchange Server and s-nail v14.9.23 on Void Linux. It
 ...
 |    s-nail: >>> T7 APPEND "Inbox" "12-Jan-2022 23:48:39 +0100" {447}
 |    s-nail: >>> SERVER: + Ready for additional command text.
 ...
 |    s-nail: >>> SERVER: * NO Keywords are not supported!
 ...
 |    s-nail: >>> SERVER: * 2 RECENT
 |    s-nail: >>> SERVER: * 6 EXISTS
 |    s-nail: >>> SERVER: T7 OK [APPENDUID 14 33] APPEND completed.
 |
 |  What actually happens is that we interpret the NO above as
 |  a statement from the server that the mailbox does not exist, and
 ...

So the problem of this mailer was that so-called untagged
responses were interpreted much too seriously.  The patch is very
simple ([1] is still too large), and has been pushed to [master]
and all the [stable/] series.

I wonder if you would like to test it with your own workflow?
It seems to work well here.  If you would, do not refrain to ask
for help.

  [1] 
https://git.sdaoden.eu/browse?p=s-nail.git;a=commitdiff;h=294ed7f97c77c4009862747057abd53acc21dc42

 |Dear Madou, thanks for reporting this issue!
 ...

Yes, thank you very much!  It never really worked ;-)

--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,                The moon bear,
|der holt sich munter           he cheerfully and one by one
|einen nach dem anderen runter  wa.ks himself off
|(By Robert Gernhardt)

Reply via email to