On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Sven Fuchs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh, I didn't even know about that. Is this required by Rails though? At least
> ActionPack relies on that String#% patch (routes behavior that uses the
> %{foo} syntax, iirc) but doesn't seem to require the Backports gem? In that
> case I'd guess it would need to go into ActiveSupport.
We've used the backports gem as inspiration or source for some
backports in AS, but it is not a Rails dependency.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby
on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
