Hey, this looks awesome :)
I've always wanted something like this in the I18n gem but never came around to it. On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:03 AM, Norman Clarke wrote: >> Quick feedback: >> — we use i18n.* namespace for stuff like pluralization — maybe this is a >> better fit than support.*?.. > > Ok, I'll change that. I agree. > That's actually what I wanted to do at first, but I didn't see how I > could access the lambda without calling it: > > http://gist.github.com/366393 > > Am I missing something? Yeah, that's a feature :) I guess we need to resolve that somehow. Can you contact me offlist about this? >> Not really sure about performance issues and solving them this way, I >> believe stuff like this is handled by pluggable back-ends; I hope Sven or >> anyone else can correct me on that. > > Ok, I'll take a look into the pluggable backends. Why not just add a .transliterate method to the I18n gem api? Seems like the right level of abstraction to me. The implementation could then easily be exchanged/extended just as other features in I18n. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
