On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 19:03, Norman Clarke <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 18:29, Yaroslav Markin > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey. Really like your patch :) > > Thanks a lot for the feedback. > >> Quick feedback: >> — we use i18n.* namespace for stuff like pluralization — maybe this is a >> better fit than support.*?.. > > Ok, I'll change that. > >> — I'm not really sure about obj.respond_to?(:transliterate) — maybe we >> should do it pluralize-like and support lambdas as argument? As well as a >> Hash, of course. It's just that storing a lambda .rb translation is a bit >> easier than storing classes :) Also, I18n 0.3 has quite good lambda >> localization support already. > > That's actually what I wanted to do at first, but I didn't see how I > could access the lambda without calling it: > > http://gist.github.com/366393 > > Am I missing something? > >> Not really sure about performance issues and solving them this way, I >> believe stuff like this is handled by pluggable back-ends; I hope Sven or >> anyone else can correct me on that. > > Ok, I'll take a look into the pluggable backends.
Sorry to answer my own post, I realized I can simply pass :resolve => false to get the Proc directly. Now I'm looking more closely at i18n's pluralizations and will see about implementing transliterations in a similar manner. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
